Shadow Siggy

[Yanger]

http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb78/Yanger2007/ShadowSiggyzzz.png

rate from 1-10

[K12]

Very well done, despite how much I hate sonic.

[kalel87]

Thats a nice sig, 7/10

[YumiKakku]

though it's not my style, it's actually really good^^
8/10

[Hariberu]

5/10, to start the render looks like its not of good quality, the edges of it are pixely. Theres no real depth, flow or lighting source. C4d usage in the left corner is a bit random as well. Also the text needs work. If my critique came off a bit harsh, its not my intention. The sig in your siggy is much better in comparison.

[Jesco]

5/10, to start the render looks like its not of good quality, the edges of it are pixely. Theres no real depth, flow or lighting source. C4d usage in the left corner is a bit random as well. Also the text needs work. If my critique came off a bit harsh, its not my intention. The sig in your siggy is much better in comparison.

QFT

I would also add that the lighting of the render makes it a bit too dark IMO. All that aside though it is a nice sig. GJ.

[Yomi]

5/10, to start the render looks like its not of good quality, the edges of it are pixely. Theres no real depth, flow or lighting source. C4d usage in the left corner is a bit random as well. Also the text needs work. If my critique came off a bit harsh, its not my intention. The sig in your siggy is much better in comparison.
I'm with Hariberu.

Try blending in your render also so it doesn't look just out there. And don't brush all over your render, it's fail in that category.
You sholud also choose C4Ds that match and work with the render rather than just random ones and placing them somewhere on the sig.
Also, bad choice in text.

[Meta]

It's not a good job rly
The effects and the flow of the colors don't match,it's not attracting

6/10

[Knight]

6 low quality